| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 26.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Apple MacPro3,1 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Apple Mac-F42C88C8 |
| Memory | 12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20080229 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | May 06 '21 at 20:54 |
| Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
| Run User | AUT-User |
| Background CPU | 17% |
PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5462
CPU-A ( 0 ), 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
|
38.6%
Below average
|
34% 55.6 Pts
|
27% 229 Pts
|
19% 300 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
CLim: 1468 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.40
|
26.6%
Poor
|
27% 33.8 fps
|
26% 32.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$32
619GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC57
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 122 120 145 155 152 MB/s
|
77.4%
Very good
|
88% 121 MB/s
|
172% 1.27 MB/s
| |
|
|
71% 95.8 MB/s
|
193% 1.47 MB/s
| ||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 16GB
null MHz
1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 2048, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB
|
16.7%
Very poor
|
17% 5.9 GB/s
|
10% 3.43 GB/s
|
24% 170 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical MacPro3,1 Builds (Compare 158 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Apple MacPro3,1
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| CPU: Intel Xeon E54621stBench 47%, 772 samples | 98x |
| Xeon E5462IntelBench 48%, 662 samples | 19x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon X54821stBench 49%, 298 samples | 15x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 680Nvidia $360Bench 32%, 38,995 samples | 22x |
| Radeon HD 2600-XTATIBench 2%, 1,081 samples | 11x |
| GeForce 8800 GTNvidiaBench 6%, 5,568 samples | 11x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 21% - Poor | Total price: $388 |