Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	43.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5 (all builds)
Memory	15.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120110
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 06 '21 at 18:21
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	HRV-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5670 9,061 User benchmarks, average bench 73% Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	71.7% Very good	Memory 88.1 1-Core 81.8 2-Core 156 66% 109 Pts	4-Core 300 8-Core 436 46% 368 Pts	64-Core 544 34% 544 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399 68,699 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Sapphire(174B E285) CLim: 1200 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.4.1 Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	43.5% Average	Lighting 60.6 Reflection 78.1 Parallax 82.5 49% 73.7 fps	MRender 61.2 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 52.1 32% 38 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 262 134 171 179 179 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 167GB free Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 688 481 279 281 284 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	123% Outstanding	Read 1,221 Write 878 Mixed 502 SusWrite 409 167% 752 MB/s	4K Read 33.2 4K Write 41.9 4K Mixed 33.3 115% 36.1 MB/s	DQ Read 438 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 254 203% 292 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 236%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2TB free Firmware: CC4H SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 166 157 152 165 153 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 208 Write 163 Mixed 82.9 SusWrite 149 110% 151 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 114%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 283GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 100 105 105 105 106 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	63.4% Good	Read 118 Write 95.6 Mixed 67.5 SusWrite 103 71% 96 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.3 223% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x4GB 28,320 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 6 of 6 slots used 24GB DIMM Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	46.8% Average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 15.3 MC Mixed 16.9 47% 16.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.3 SC Write 10.7 SC Mixed 11.7 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 69.4 58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-EX58-UD5 Builds (Compare 475 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 33%

Sail boat

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	209x
Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples	48x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	30x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	33x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	30x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	24x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	23x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	20x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	17x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	71x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	65x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	49x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $390

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16