Gigabyte GA-F2A78M-HD2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics29.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive18.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A78M-HD2  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 06 '21 at 16:44
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon X4 880K-$105
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
46.8% Average
Memory 60.5
1-Core 44
2-Core 130
45% 78.2 Pts
4-Core 191
8-Core 204
26% 197 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.9% Poor
Lighting 37.6
Reflection 42.5
Parallax 39.7
31% 39.9 fps
MRender 38.4
Gravity 40
Splatting 28.6
28% 35.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 78 103 90 79 74 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
18.8% Very poor
Read 29.6
Write 112
Mixed 16.4
SusWrite 89.3
14% 61.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 10.5
4K Mixed 10.5
19% 7.03 MB/s
DQ Read 79.1
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 146
105% 131 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 87%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$50
366GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 100 102 102 102 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 102
Write 97.2
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 101
70% 94.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 74%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$23
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 149 150 150 150 149 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
88% Excellent
Read 158
Write 136
Mixed 81.3
SusWrite 148
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 88%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.7% Below average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 14.6
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 10.8
24% 8.53 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A78M-HD2 Builds (Compare 248 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A78M-HD2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $88
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback