Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3340-$278 8,792 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	74.8% Very good	Memory 92.5 1-Core 88.9 2-Core 177 71% 119 Pts	4-Core 331 8-Core 340 45% 335 Pts	64-Core 342 21% 342 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 505 154 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 8449) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 311.06 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.21% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 1.8 Parallax 1.5 1% 1.47 fps	MRender 4.7 Gravity 0.9 Splatting 1.5 2% 2.37 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.21% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 392 Write 368 Mixed 269 76% 343 MB/s	4K Read 22.4 4K Write 30.4 4K Mixed 33.6 93% 28.8 MB/s	DQ Read 41.2 DQ Write 109 DQ Mixed 40.6 41% 63.5 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 459GB free Firmware: MS1OA7L0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 178 174 181 181 181 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 181 Write 166 Mixed 36.8 SusWrite 179 102% 141 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 139% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown AO2L16BC2P1-BR3S 4x2GB 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	59.8% Above average	MC Read 21.8 MC Write 22.5 MC Mixed 18.2 60% 20.8 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 18.2 48% 16.9 GB/s	Latency 63.2 63% 63.2 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	19x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	7x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	6x

RAM
TS1GLK64V6H 2x8GBTranscendBench 53%, 1,052 samples	5x
HY64C1C1624ZY 1x4GBUnknownBench 31%, 187 samples	4x
ASU16D3LU1KBG/8G 2x8GBKingstonBench 55%, 954 samples	3x

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $144

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16