Asus M5A97 LE R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics44.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A97 LE R2.0  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160324
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMay 06 '21 at 01:49
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8310
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
63% Good
Memory 85.7
1-Core 62.4
2-Core 120
56% 89.3 Pts
4-Core 219
8-Core 323
34% 271 Pts
64-Core 334
21% 334 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
44.7% Average
Lighting 57.9
Reflection 59.3
Parallax 51.2
47% 56.1 fps
MRender 42.4
Gravity 54.1
Splatting 48.8
40% 48.4 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX100 250GB-$141
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 343 360 365 361 364 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 472
Write 368
Mixed 20.5
SusWrite 330
66% 298 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 60
4K Mixed 32.9
74% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 204
DQ Mixed 180
146% 206 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 103%
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
61GB free
Firmware: 2.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 120 115 96 99 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
51% Above average
Read 179
Write 140
Mixed 143
SusWrite 106
32% 142 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 62
4K Mixed 28
104% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 81.2
73% 110 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 51%
Great: 61%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
2.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 152 152 153 152 152 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 152
Write 145
Mixed 82.5
SusWrite 145
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 85%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
507GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 84 85 85 85 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 81.2
Write 80.5
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 82.8
54% 73.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 68%
Seagate Backup+ Desktop 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: D702
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 129 128 129 129 132 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 134
Write 102
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 124
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 108%
WD My Book Essentials 1TB
687GB free, PID 1110
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 27 28 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 28
Write 25.8
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 26.4
36% 26.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.2% Average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 16
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 11.7
27% 9.47 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 LE R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,453 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $334
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback