Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 77% Battleship	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 75% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	94.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	92.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	120.8 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200728
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 05 '21 at 21:43
Run Duration	302 Seconds
Run User	NZL-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	75.3% Very good	Memory 71.5 1-Core 108 2-Core 206 72% 128 Pts	4-Core 426 8-Core 690 68% 558 Pts	64-Core 1,154 71% 1,154 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400 91,676 User benchmarks, average bench 87% AMD(1002 6B76) CLim: 1550 MHz, MLim: 1100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.3.1 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	94.6% Outstanding	Lighting 125 Reflection 107 Parallax 208 102% 146 fps	MRender 90.2 Gravity 138 Splatting 73.5 80% 101 fps
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 94.6% Great: 94%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 156GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 200 208 247 177 65 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	92.8% Outstanding	Read 490 Write 465 Mixed 362 SusWrite 220 86% 384 MB/s	4K Read 34.8 4K Write 63.7 4K Mixed 42.7 141% 47.1 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 333 DQ Mixed 240 211% 316 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 92.8% Great: 126%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 147GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 248 95 58 54 54 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	90.3% Outstanding	Read 492 Write 470 Mixed 416 SusWrite 159 86% 384 MB/s	4K Read 34.7 4K Write 65.2 4K Mixed 44 144% 48 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 349 DQ Mixed 252 220% 326 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 90.3% Great: 126%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 465GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2214 827 804 790 805 812 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	246% Outstanding	Read 2,427 Write 1941 Mixed 1,777 SusWrite 1,042 402% 1,797 MB/s	4K Read 52.4 4K Write 88.6 4K Mixed 64.9 210% 68.6 MB/s	DQ Read 524 DQ Write 364 DQ Mixed 481 349% 457 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 246% Great: 355%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2TB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 108 109 110 110 111 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	61.2% Good	Read 104 Write 98.1 Mixed 86.9 SusWrite 109 74% 99.4 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2TB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 90 91 92 92 91 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	52.3% Above average	Read 93.2 Write 94 Mixed 32.8 SusWrite 89.4 56% 77.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 85% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 67%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 123 124 123 123 97 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	65.5% Good	Read 110 Write 98.9 Mixed 75.4 SusWrite 118 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1 170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 83%
ST10000V N0004-1ZD101 10TB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 835GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 1 1.3 3.8 2.5 3.1 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	47.7% Average	Read 213 Write 211 Mixed 110 SusWrite 2.7 165% 134 MB/s	4K Read 12.6 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 1.2 234% 6.03 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 81%
ST10000V N0004-1ZD101 10TB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 8TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 189 183 184 186 185 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	89.8% Excellent	Read 224 Write 226 Mixed 129 SusWrite 185 254% 191 MB/s	4K Read 12.2 4K Write 4.6 4K Mixed 1.2 242% 6 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 89.8% Great: 81%
ST10000V N0004-1ZD101 10TB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 9TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 189 184 185 187 185 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	93.2% Outstanding	Read 241 Write 220 Mixed 119 SusWrite 186 251% 191 MB/s	4K Read 13 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 1.3 256% 6.37 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 93.2% Great: 81%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown GP-DSG64G32 4x31.8GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 4 of 4 slots used 127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	90.4% Outstanding	MC Read 34.9 MC Write 32.9 MC Mixed 30.3 93% 32.7 GB/s	SC Read 23.2 SC Write 35.3 SC Mixed 27.6 82% 28.7 GB/s	Latency 98.1 41% 98.1 ns
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 90.4% Great: 159%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,520 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	415x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	214x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	188x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $39Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)