Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics54% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive236% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210329
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateMay 05 '21 at 12:27
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Memory 74.7
1-Core 125
2-Core 246
81% 149 Pts
4-Core 484
8-Core 836
80% 660 Pts
64-Core 1,268
78% 1,268 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
54% Above average
Lighting 66.2
Reflection 66.6
Parallax 61.2
54% 64.7 fps
MRender 64.2
Gravity 69.5
Splatting 64.5
54% 66.1 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
252GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 875 615 607 612 614 611 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 2,430
Write 2,223
Mixed 1,566
SusWrite 656
384% 1,719 MB/s
4K Read 52
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 67.5
222% 75.7 MB/s
DQ Read 792
DQ Write 546
DQ Mixed 734
530% 690 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 236%
Great: 340%
Kxg60znv256g NVMe TOSHIBA 256GB
62GB free
Firmware: 10604107 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,245
Write 1,067
Mixed 1,027
248% 1,113 MB/s
4K Read 45.4
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 58.9
200% 69.7 MB/s
DQ Read 862
DQ Write 746
DQ Mixed 757
580% 788 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 242%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
394GB free
Firmware: UH5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 59 120 49 107 50 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 445
Write 302
Mixed 259
SusWrite 114
62% 280 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 39.9
4K Mixed 8.4
53% 20.8 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 90.5
DQ Mixed 11.8
34% 72.9 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 58%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB
8GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
7.52% Terrible
Read 24.7
Write 13.5
Mixed 9.8
SusWrite 13.5
19% 15.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 7.52%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D30BESBK.8FD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.7% Very good
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 27.2
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 24
70% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 91
44% 91 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,627 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $673
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback