Performance Results


Gaming 60% Gunboat	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 60% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	57.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	338% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME (all builds)
Memory	60.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190710
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 05 '21 at 09:36
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5960X-$285 15,468 User benchmarks, average bench 80% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	89.3% Excellent	Memory 87.4 1-Core 99.6 2-Core 250 80% 146 Pts	4-Core 489 8-Core 983 87% 736 Pts	64-Core 1,338 83% 1,338 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 89.3% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615 15,621 User benchmarks, average bench 75% Asus(1043 8539) CLim: 1707 MHz, MLim: 1777 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 466.27 Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	57.7% Above average	Lighting 107 Reflection 20.9 Parallax 9.3 87% 45.7 fps	MRender 1 Gravity 1 Splatting 1 1% 1 fps
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 83%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$168 138,083 User benchmarks, average bench 416% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2287 2216 2299 2172 2098 2094 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	338% Outstanding	Read 2,108 Write 2,078 Mixed 1,982 SusWrite 2,194 472% 2,090 MB/s	4K Read 63.3 4K Write 138 4K Mixed 84.4 277% 95.2 MB/s	DQ Read 898 DQ Write 600 DQ Mixed 816 591% 772 MB/s
Poor: 283% ↑ This bench: 338% Great: 526%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 2TB 2,362 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 393 397 392 391 391 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	71.2% Very good	Read 379 Write 386 Mixed 337 SusWrite 393 84% 374 MB/s	4K Read 20.6 4K Write 35.1 4K Mixed 25.2 82% 27 MB/s	DQ Read 154 DQ Write 132 DQ Mixed 162 116% 149 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 97%
TOSHIBA USB MEM 1GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID 1e23 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 5.2 5.2 5.3 5.2 5.3 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	4.46% Terrible	Read 11.4 Write 4.2 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 5.2 7% 6.25 MB/s	4K Read 7.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 26% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.46% Great: 5%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMK32GX4M4B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK32GX4M4B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK32GX4M4B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK32GX4M4B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 64GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 126% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	117% Outstanding	MC Read 50.9 MC Write 43.9 MC Mixed 42.8 131% 45.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 23.4 SC Mixed 23 59% 20.7 GB/s	Latency 70.1 57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 118% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 133%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 101%

UFO

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 90%

Aircraft carrier

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	79x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	61x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	60x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GBCorsair $92Bench 85%, 8,498 samples	36x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2800 C16 4x4GBCorsair $210Bench 88%, 3,970 samples	34x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GBCorsair $115Bench 88%, 5,380 samples	28x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $864

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16