Samsung 500T

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemSamsung 500T  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG XE500T1C-A01IT
Memory1.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 12 '17 at 01:00
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom Z2760
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Memory 35.1
1-Core 7.6
2-Core 14
15% 18.9 Pts
4-Core 23.9
8-Core 23
3% 23.5 Pts
64-Core 23.5
2% 23.5 Pts
Poor: 8%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 20%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator
Sanyo(144D C0D6)
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 9.14.3.1087
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
0.43% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 0.38
Parallax 0.34
1% 0.51 fps
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MMC Memory Card 63GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.0
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 25% Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2 800 MHz clocked @ 1 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
9.54% Terrible
MC Read 3.7
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 2.9
9% 3.17 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 2.5
6% 2.27 GB/s
Latency 226
18% 226 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.54%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback