HP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-an0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics44.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-an0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8393
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190418
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 05 '21 at 06:55
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User EST-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 87.2
1-Core 113
2-Core 196
77% 132 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 541
56% 451 Pts
64-Core 541
34% 541 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
HP(103C 8393) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2079 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.4% Average
Lighting 52.9
Reflection 88.7
Parallax 64
43% 68.5 fps
MRender 26.7
Gravity 60.8
Splatting 74.7
47% 54.1 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSN5256GPUK NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5KHA4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 174 215 91 78 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Read 766
Write 709
Mixed 642
SusWrite 162
127% 570 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 96.7
4K Mixed 50
170% 61 MB/s
DQ Read 36.2
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 49.6
45% 65.9 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 141%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
296GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3T0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 88 88 88 89 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 131
Write 109
Mixed 24.9
SusWrite 87.3
64% 88.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 75%
ADATA HD710 1TB
170GB free, PID a15a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
19% Very poor
Read 37.4
Write 35.1
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 38.1
45% 33.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
76.4% Very good
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 29.4
MC Mixed 22.4
78% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 28.8
SC Mixed 23.8
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 17-an0xx Builds (Compare 1,433 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-an0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback