Asrock X399 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 110% UFO	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 112% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	350% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

Motherboard	Asrock X399 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	58.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191204
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	May 05 '21 at 00:03
Run Duration	417 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	24%

Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 2920X 3,902 User benchmarks, average bench 81% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	91.3% Outstanding	Memory 89.3 1-Core 128 2-Core 256 88% 158 Pts	4-Core 501 8-Core 798 80% 650 Pts	64-Core 1,633 101% 1,633 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 91.3% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210 663,603 User benchmarks, average bench 115% MSI(1462 373E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2280 MHz, MLim: 3665 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 465.89 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	121% Outstanding	Lighting 159 Reflection 218 Parallax 156 129% 178 fps	MRender 191 Gravity 139 Splatting 122 120% 151 fps
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 123%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170 93,447 User benchmarks, average bench 322% 234GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2182 2196 2197 2191 2002 1994 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	350% Outstanding	Read 2,599 Write 2,212 Mixed 1,520 SusWrite 2,127 474% 2,114 MB/s	4K Read 55.6 4K Write 136 4K Mixed 76.1 254% 89.2 MB/s	DQ Read 993 DQ Write 674 DQ Mixed 905 656% 858 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 350% Great: 393%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 1TB 27,887 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 695GB free Firmware: RVT23B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 472 471 473 472 473 468 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	118% Outstanding	Read 506 Write 471 Mixed 437 SusWrite 472 106% 472 MB/s	4K Read 41.5 4K Write 85.1 4K Mixed 55 178% 60.5 MB/s	DQ Read 297 DQ Write 289 DQ Mixed 297 222% 294 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 133%
PNY CS3030 1TB SSD 12,276 User benchmarks, average bench 228% 92GB free Firmware: CS303226 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,379 Write 2529 Mixed 1,603 415% 1,837 MB/s	4K Read 44.4 4K Write 153 4K Mixed 73.9 243% 90.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,053 DQ Write 902 DQ Mixed 1,054 769% 1,003 MB/s
Poor: 157% Great: 286%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB 44,528 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 556GB free Firmware: UH5100RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 155 120 98 86 126 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	49.8% Average	Read 451 Write 386 Mixed 276 SusWrite 132 69% 311 MB/s	4K Read 13 4K Write 42.7 4K Mixed 15.3 62% 23.7 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 101 DQ Mixed 30.5 44% 82.5 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 58%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 463GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 471 469 471 469 471 472 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	123% Outstanding	Read 500 Write 478 Mixed 411 SusWrite 470 105% 465 MB/s	4K Read 42.4 4K Write 94.5 4K Mixed 56.2 186% 64.4 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 353 DQ Mixed 360 272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 445GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 472 468 470 469 470 471 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	123% Outstanding	Read 500 Write 479 Mixed 404 SusWrite 470 104% 463 MB/s	4K Read 42.4 4K Write 93.4 4K Mixed 56.5 186% 64.1 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 355 DQ Mixed 362 273% 365 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 465GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 472 469 471 470 470 472 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	123% Outstanding	Read 500 Write 471 Mixed 411 SusWrite 471 104% 463 MB/s	4K Read 42 4K Write 91.2 4K Mixed 56.8 185% 63.3 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 352 DQ Mixed 360 271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 134%
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB 31,052 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 439GB free Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 484 369 327 328 327 326 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 496 Write 448 Mixed 349 SusWrite 360 93% 413 MB/s	4K Read 41.2 4K Write 93.7 4K Mixed 54.8 182% 63.2 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 352 DQ Mixed 348 266% 359 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 123%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 464GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 482 482 482 482 482 480 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	122% Outstanding	Read 498 Write 479 Mixed 406 SusWrite 482 105% 466 MB/s	4K Read 38.5 4K Write 91.4 4K Mixed 56.6 179% 62.2 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 353 DQ Mixed 362 272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 122% Great: 134%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB 71,657 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2TB free Firmware: SBK2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 125 126 126 125 127 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	66.4% Good	Read 106 Write 93 Mixed 58 SusWrite 124 70% 95.4 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 200% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 67%
Seagate ST4000LM016-1N2170 4TB 2,075 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2TB free Firmware: 0003 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 110 111 111 111 111 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	53.3% Above average	Read 77.7 Write 88.7 Mixed 66.5 SusWrite 106 63% 84.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 6 4K Mixed 0.4 214% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 3200 8x8GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 119% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	60.8% Good	MC Read 22 MC Write 19.8 MC Mixed 19.7 59% 20.5 GB/s	SC Read 20.4 SC Write 23 SC Mixed 20.8 61% 21.4 GB/s	Latency 68.1 59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 163%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X399 Taichi Builds (Compare 561 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 120%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Taichi

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	155x
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	114x
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $798Bench 81%, 10,169 samples	103x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	47x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	36x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	27x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	38x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	28x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	19x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	13x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	12x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBG.SKILL $139Bench 95%, 14,506 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $915

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16