Monster TULPAR T7 V12.1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 69% Battle cruiser	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 59% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	76.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Monster TULPAR T7 V12.1 (all builds)
Motherboard	MONSTER TULPAR T7 V12.1
Memory	7.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170320
Uptime	17 Days
Run Date	May 04 '21 at 19:16
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$242 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	90% Outstanding	Memory 91.9 1-Core 140 2-Core 280 94% 170 Pts	4-Core 475 8-Core 709 74% 592 Pts	64-Core 703 44% 703 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 90% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile) 73,882 User benchmarks, average bench 72% Clevo(1558 7708) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.27 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	76.8% Very good	Lighting 93.1 Reflection 170 Parallax 92.4 76% 119 fps	MRender 93.1 Gravity 93.1 Splatting 100 79% 95.4 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 76.8% Great: 82%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 99,566 User benchmarks, average bench 177% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1L1QCXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,531 Write 1,040 Mixed 664 238% 1,078 MB/s	4K Read 57.7 4K Write 152 4K Mixed 76.7 266% 95.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1,198 DQ Write 951 DQ Mixed 952 746% 1,034 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 236%
WD WD10JPLX-00MBPT0 1TB 11,708 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 795GB free Firmware: 1H01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 123 137 133 134 110 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	72.3% Very good	Read 128 Write 125 Mixed 32.7 SusWrite 124 74% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 133% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GB 20,956 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	73.8% Very good	MC Read 26.9 MC Write 27.3 MC Mixed 23.3 74% 25.8 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 28.5 SC Mixed 23.8 66% 23 GB/s	Latency 64.3 62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TULPAR T7 V12.1 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Destroyer

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 56%

Gunboat

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V12.1

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $242Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	17x

GPU
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples	16x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	1x

SSD
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	6x
600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $119Bench 128%, 20,782 samples	2x
Raid 0 Volume 512GBIntelBench 191%, 18,578 samples	1x

RAM
F4 DDR4 2133 C15 4x16GBG.SKILLBench 71%, 66 samples	2x
F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 75%, 4,823 samples	2x
F4 DDR4 2133 C15 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 72%, 1,022 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $242

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16