Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics47.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 04 '21 at 15:08
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Memory 71.1
1-Core 140
2-Core 274
86% 162 Pts
4-Core 513
8-Core 816
82% 664 Pts
64-Core 998
62% 998 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
MSI(1462 8D97) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
47.2% Average
Lighting 59.5
Reflection 59.3
Parallax 55.5
48% 58.1 fps
MRender 65.3
Gravity 53.4
Splatting 47.9
44% 55.5 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Neo Forza NFS011SA356-6007000 256GB
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 153 83 62 61 63 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 497
Write 394
Mixed 405
SusWrite 131
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 89.2
4K Mixed 31.5
142% 52.1 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 52.4
73% 133 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 92%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB
921GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 204 206 206 207 205 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 493
Write 202
Mixed 268
SusWrite 205
65% 292 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 4
46% 10.7 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 99%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 176 178 177 178 177 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 167
Mixed 105
SusWrite 176
114% 155 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
248% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$56
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.8% Good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 26.5
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 23.6
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 98.9
40% 98.9 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,795 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $937
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback