Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 173%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 280%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics240% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive212% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemGigabyte X399 AORUS XTREME
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF  (all builds)
Memory119.1 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display5120 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190508
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 03 '21 at 20:13
Run Duration317 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen TR 2990WX-$1,412
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 73.8
1-Core 106
2-Core 223
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 769
72% 584 Pts
64-Core 4,110
276% 4,110 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 74%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,500
Gigabyte(1458 4042) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
240% Outstanding
Lighting 319
Reflection 304
Parallax 361
258% 328 fps
MRender 353
Gravity 256
Splatting 191
218% 267 fps
Poor: 191%
This bench: 240%
Great: 261%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$109
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 287 286 285 271 276 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
212% Outstanding
Read 2,379
Write 1,384
Mixed 1,224
SusWrite 309
292% 1,324 MB/s
4K Read 49.3
4K Write 99.5
4K Mixed 64.1
210% 71 MB/s
DQ Read 835
DQ Write 636
DQ Mixed 757
560% 743 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 212%
Great: 280%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$210
168GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 471 471 460 473 447 478 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 476
Mixed 450
SusWrite 466
106% 471 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 8.7
4K Mixed 39.4
108% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 300
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 335
248% 326 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 97%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$210
247GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 476 438 477 477 477 476 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 475
Mixed 436
SusWrite 470
106% 468 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 71.2
4K Mixed 45.7
149% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 339
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 347
260% 345 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 110%
Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$142
586GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2360 2146 1113 1130 1133 1130 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
305% Outstanding
Read 2,519
Write 2,344
Mixed 1,694
SusWrite 1502
452% 2,015 MB/s
4K Read 55.3
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 75.6
249% 86.8 MB/s
DQ Read 839
DQ Write 726
DQ Mixed 791
591% 785 MB/s
Poor: 224%
This bench: 305%
Great: 365%
WD Black 6TB (2016)-$249
1.5TB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 185 181 187 184 186 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 167
Mixed 72.6
SusWrite 185
109% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 0.7
233% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 104%
Great: 122%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70% Good
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 23.3
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 23.6
SC Write 27.9
SC Mixed 24.9
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 92.8
43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 70%
Great: 186%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF Builds (Compare 566 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 138%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 171%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $2,806
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback