To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics53.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 03 '21 at 06:37
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 38%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2689 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
70% Good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 87.4
2-Core 174
67% 115 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 476
48% 392 Pts
64-Core 830
51% 830 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 70%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 85C5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 462.31
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.2% Above average
Lighting 65.2
Reflection 69.6
Parallax 64.3
53% 66.4 fps
MRender 64.3
Gravity 66.7
Splatting 64.4
53% 65.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 128GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 250
Write 184
Mixed 209
48% 214 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 34
4K Mixed 1.3
55% 19.5 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 153
122% 169 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 85%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
141GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 9.9 17 17 13 15 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 30% Great: 77%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
327GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 209 210 209 211 211 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 30% Great: 77%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
271GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 147 149 148 148 149 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 105
Write 98.5
Mixed 64
SusWrite 148
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
216% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 109%
WD Green 500GB (2012)
235GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 86 87 93 89 91 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 80.5
Write 102
Mixed 82.2
SusWrite 88.2
66% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0- 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
MC Read 38.2
MC Write 37.9
MC Mixed 33.6
104% 36.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 11.3
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $183Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback