Performance Results

Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop 61%
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.38% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive48.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemGPU GWTN156-5  (all builds)
MotherboardGPU GPU Company
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201217
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateMay 02 '21 at 17:14
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U Vega Mobile Gfx
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Memory 68.9
1-Core 102
2-Core 171
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 372
41% 319 Pts
64-Core 375
25% 375 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
AMD(1002 15D8) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
6.38% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 9.7
Parallax 11.4
6% 9.37 fps
MRender 9.6
Gravity 8.8
Splatting 10.5
7% 9.63 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.38%
Great: 13%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Netac 256GB 256GB
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1118A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 57 55 57 58 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 428
Write 99.8
Mixed 61.6
SusWrite 58.9
35% 162 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 25.4
4K Mixed 19.9
71% 22.1 MB/s
DQ Read 193
DQ Write 57
DQ Mixed 9
37% 86.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.8% Good
MC Read 25
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 21.3
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 23.2
72% 25 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GWTN156-5 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop 54%
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: GPU GWTN156-5

The Best.
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $94SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback