Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412DA_X412DA

Performance Results

Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop 70%
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive183% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412DA_X412DA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X412DA
Memory2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200908
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateMay 02 '21 at 13:40
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 71.2
1-Core 104
2-Core 183
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 524
56% 438 Pts
64-Core 514
34% 514 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 1831) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver:
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Lighting 12.1
Reflection 9.8
Parallax 18.1
10% 13.3 fps
MRender 11
Gravity 14.1
Splatting 11.7
11% 12.3 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 13%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1202 512GB
399GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20200000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 760 589 564 563 571 562 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
183% Outstanding
Read 1,233
Write 1,211
Mixed 1,056
SusWrite 601
230% 1,025 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 58.4
202% 73.7 MB/s
DQ Read 876
DQ Write 692
DQ Mixed 781
585% 783 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 183%
Great: 210%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
2400, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
65.5% Good
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 21.2
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 28.9
SC Mixed 21.9
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 98.6
41% 98.6 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412DA_X412DA Builds (Compare 816 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop 59%
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412DA_X412DA

The Best.
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-10700K $293Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $92SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback