Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	55.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T9500-$125 996 User benchmarks, average bench 39% Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	38.8% Below average	Memory 65.9 1-Core 36.5 2-Core 71.5 38% 58 Pts	4-Core 71.7 8-Core 69.7 10% 70.7 Pts	64-Core 68.3 4% 68.3 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 43%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SS3V1240-240GB 240GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 29GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1230A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 203 215 215 215 188 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	55.2% Above average	Read 250 Write 212 Mixed 222 SusWrite 202 50% 221 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 46.2 4K Mixed 22.9 88% 30.5 MB/s	DQ Read 144 DQ Write 128 DQ Mixed 47.8 60% 107 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 84%
WD WD1200BEVS-60UST0 120GB 3,683 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 27GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 29 29 29 29 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	18.3% Very poor	Read 34.6 Write 34.4 Mixed 24.5 SusWrite 28.5 22% 30.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 29%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14.1% Very poor	MC Read 5.3 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 3.8 12% 4.3 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 3.4 SC Mixed 4.1 10% 3.67 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo T7250Intel $97Bench 34%, 3,604 samples	6x
Core2 Duo T7700Intel $100Bench 37%, 1,898 samples	3x
Core2 Duo T8100Intel $78Bench 35%, 2,639 samples	3x

GPU
Quadro NVS 140MNvidiaBench 1%, 885 samples	11x
Quadro NVS 135MNvidiaBench 0%, 34 samples	3x
Intel 965 Express Chipset FamilyMobileBench 0%, 3,066 samples	2x

Value: 40% - Average

Total price: $125

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16