Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics41.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte AX370-Gaming K5
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF  (all builds)
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180417
Uptime4.6 Days
Run DateMay 02 '21 at 10:01
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$263
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 75.5
1-Core 106
2-Core 206
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 690
64% 520 Pts
64-Core 1,042
70% 1,042 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 88%
Graphics Cards Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$220
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.3.2
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.6% Average
Lighting 45.5
Reflection 59
Parallax 61.2
37% 55.2 fps
MRender 60.2
Gravity 58.5
Splatting 44.6
47% 54.4 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 60%
AMD RX 560-$500
CLim: 1196 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.3.2
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
22.1% Poor
Lighting 26.2
Reflection 28
Parallax 36.6
21% 30.3 fps
MRender 27.5
Gravity 29
Splatting 20
23% 25.5 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 26%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 128GB-$75
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2306RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 141 150 143 142 146 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 454
Write 216
Mixed 167
SusWrite 148
54% 246 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 62.2
4K Mixed 29.8
110% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 122
123% 201 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 92%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$48
292GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 50 56 51 59 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 119
Write 109
Mixed 90.2
SusWrite 57.6
70% 94 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 87%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$40
388GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 93 92 87 93 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 81.5
Write 74.5
Mixed 18.3
SusWrite 91.3
48% 66.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.4
77% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$83
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
66.7% Good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 24.4
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 20
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 89.2
45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF Builds (Compare 2,442 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $964
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $94SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback