Asrock H510M-HDV/M.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics29.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive232% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H510M-HDV/M.2  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 02 '21 at 06:36
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-10400-$199
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 91
1-Core 114
2-Core 207
82% 137 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 646
65% 513 Pts
64-Core 1,009
68% 1,009 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$155
HP(103C 8465) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 460.93
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.3% Poor
Lighting 34.9
Reflection 46.7
Parallax 33.6
28% 38.4 fps
MRender 38.2
Gravity 38
Splatting 27.1
31% 34.4 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 35%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Pcie SSD 1TB
893GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM53.0 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1918 1864 1870 1857 1863 1847 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
232% Outstanding
Read 962
Write 1,386
Mixed 1,072
SusWrite 1,870
301% 1,322 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 90.9
4K Mixed 44.1
150% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 736
DQ Write 734
DQ Mixed 890
626% 786 MB/s
Poor: 100%
This bench: 232%
Great: 447%
SSD 240GB
175GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 91 91 94 92 93 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23.4% Poor
Read 126
Write 61.1
Mixed 54.3
SusWrite 91.6
19% 83.3 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 16.2
4K Mixed 9
40% 12.9 MB/s
DQ Read 15
DQ Write 14.4
DQ Mixed 14.1
11% 14.5 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
77.5% Very good
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 23.4
79% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 23.1
65% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical H510M-HDV/M.2 Builds (Compare 60 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H510M-HDV/M.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $230
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $94SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback