Asus Rampage Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive69.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus Rampage Formula  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 02 '21 at 02:40
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650-$170
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Memory 82.8
1-Core 47.2
2-Core 94.7
49% 74.9 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 185
25% 187 Pts
64-Core 187
12% 187 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
MSI(1462 3367) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 150
Parallax 139
112% 142 fps
MRender 121
Gravity 144
Splatting 125
106% 130 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 108%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 187 174 172 169 175 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
69.5% Good
Read 265
Write 238
Mixed 240
SusWrite 185
52% 232 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 56.8
4K Mixed 40.2
137% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 63.2
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 116
87% 113 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 134%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$146
802GB free
Firmware: FP1R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 179 180 182 181 181 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 114
Write 115
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 181
84% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 104%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
621GB free
Firmware: 50.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 81 82 68 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 82.3
Write 89.1
Mixed 77.1
SusWrite 79.2
61% 81.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
25.6% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 7.5
23% 8.07 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 8
21% 7.27 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Rampage Formula Builds (Compare 138 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Rampage Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $248
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback