Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	15.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2557M 714 User benchmarks, average bench 50% Socket BGA1023, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	42.8% Average	Memory 59.4 1-Core 65.7 2-Core 104 46% 76.2 Pts	4-Core 153 8-Core 155 20% 154 Pts	64-Core 156 10% 156 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) 209,058 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Toshiba(1179 0009) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	1.71% Terrible	Lighting 1.9 Reflection 2 Parallax 1.6 2% 1.83 fps	MRender 2.5 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 2.5 2% 2.47 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.71% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNB128GMCJ 128GB 582 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 20GB free (System drive) Firmware: AJTA0202 SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 33 37 36 35 32 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	15.8% Very poor	Read 108 Write 53.8 Mixed 38 SusWrite 34.9 13% 58.8 MB/s	4K Read 6.5 4K Write 22 4K Mixed 6.1 29% 11.5 MB/s	DQ Read 0.5 DQ Write 24.3 DQ Mixed 6.1 7% 10.3 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 10GB 21,027 User benchmarks, average bench 31% null MHz 2048, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	44.5% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 16 MC Mixed 15.3 46% 15.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 13 SC Mixed 13.2 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 130 31% 130 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	42x

SSD
THNSNB128GMCJ 128GBToshibaBench 16%, 582 samples	20x
850 EVO mSATA 250GBSamsungBench 95%, 4,026 samples	3x
THNSNS Series mSATA PCI-E 128GB ToshibaBench 67%, 614 samples	3x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16