PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 62.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | EVGA 131-GT-E767 (all builds) |
Memory | 20 GB free of 24 GB @ 1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110825 |
Uptime | 2.8 Days |
Run Date | May 01 '21 at 16:09 |
Run Duration | 164 Seconds |
Run User | ROU-User |
Background CPU | 1% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-950-$100
Socket 423, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
66.1%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
49%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$60
348GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 108 115 113 115 112 MB/s
|
62.9%
Good
|
|||
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
55GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 76 74 74 74 77 MB/s
|
39.6%
Below average
|
|||
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
267GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 95 98 100 99 101 MB/s
|
63.6%
Good
|
|||
Kingston DataTraveler R3.0 USB 3.0 16GB-$15
11GB free, PID 168e
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 23 23 23 23 20 MB/s
|
11.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
41.5%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples | 37x |
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples | 11x |
Xeon X5670IntelBench 73%, 9,061 samples | 6x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 7x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 5x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 5x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 61% - Good | Total price: $359 |