Alienware M18xR1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAlienware M18xR1  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware M18xR1
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111129
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 01 '21 at 15:33
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2920XM
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Memory 86.6
1-Core 90.7
2-Core 158
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 80.9
8-Core 108
12% 94.2 Pts
64-Core 370
23% 370 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460M
Dell(1028 048F) 1.5GB
Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 306.97
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 6% Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$99
878GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 463 448 421 430 431 430 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 448
Write 427
Mixed 407
SusWrite 437
97% 430 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 75.6
4K Mixed 39.8
142% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 308
237% 324 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 103%
Great: 137%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$99
930GB free
Firmware: SVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 463 448 421 430 431 430 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 448
Write 429
Mixed 408
SusWrite 437
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 74.6
4K Mixed 41
142% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 367
270% 354 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 104%
Great: 137%
UFD 3.0 Silicon-Power16G 16GB
7GB free, PID 0902
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 29.7
Write 20.7
Mixed 15
SusWrite 20.2
27% 21.4 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0
20% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 19%
JetFlash Transcend 8GB
2GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 3.6 4.4 4.7 4.5 5.4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
7.78% Terrible
Read 27.5
Write 11.7
Mixed 5
SusWrite 4.6
13% 12.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
47% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.78%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot PSD34G16002S 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
55.5% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 17.7
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 17.7
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M18xR1 Builds (Compare 106 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Alienware M18xR1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $360
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback