Casper Excalibur G5K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCasper Excalibur G5K  (all builds)
MotherboardCasper Excalibur G5K
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160707
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 01 '21 at 12:00
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 87.7
1-Core 87.2
2-Core 172
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 412
47% 366 Pts
64-Core 429
27% 429 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960M
Clevo(1558 1501) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
18% Very poor
Lighting 22.6
Reflection 26.2
Parallax 22.8
18% 23.9 fps
MRender 24.4
Gravity 23.3
Splatting 16.8
17% 21.5 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLF128HCHP-00000 128GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXT2101Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 41 42 43 41 37 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
47% Average
Read 440
Write 89.3
Mixed 112
SusWrite 41.6
37% 171 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 25.8
4K Mixed 17.4
75% 23.1 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 25.1
DQ Mixed 38.2
43% 76.7 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47%
Great: 59%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58
554GB free
Firmware: AX1P1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 82 83 83 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 97
Write 94
Mixed 32
SusWrite 81.9
55% 76.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 62%
Seagate BUP Slim BL 1TB
102GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
21.2% Poor
Read 32.8
Write 39.8
Mixed 33.2
SusWrite 40.5
27% 36.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFD8213.C16FBD1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
74.8% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 23.6
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 22.5
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Excalibur G5K Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Casper Excalibur G5K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback