Asus PRIME A320M-F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-F  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191014
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 01 '21 at 02:14
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$97
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 106
2-Core 210
75% 133 Pts
4-Core 379
8-Core 598
60% 488 Pts
64-Core 763
47% 763 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.1% Poor
Lighting 35.1
Reflection 40.4
Parallax 37.4
29% 37.6 fps
MRender 37.4
Gravity 38
Splatting 26.7
27% 34 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
APS-SL3N-240 240GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0813A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 7.3 21 11 7.3 8.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 449
Write 20
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 10.5
26% 125 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 15.5
4K Mixed 0.5
57% 15.9 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 19.5
DQ Mixed 0.4
27% 69.5 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 92%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$178
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 138 138 138 139 137 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 150
Write 145
Mixed 83
SusWrite 138
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.1
217% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 98%
WD Purple 1TB (2014)-$40
305GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 45 46 46 46 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 80.7
Write 76
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 45.6
51% 68.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL8G30C15U4R.M8FE1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
48.6% Average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 15.6
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 16.4
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-F Builds (Compare 540 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $130
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback