Acer Aspire X3200

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemAcer Aspire X3200  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer WMCP78M
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080731
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateJul 10 '17 at 20:04
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Phenom 8400 Triple-Core
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
22.6% Poor
1-Core 38.7
2-Core 75.9
27% 57.3 Pts
4-Core 112
8-Core 110
15% 111 Pts
64-Core 110
7% 110 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 23%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9200
Acer(1025 0157) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.47% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 0.6
0% 1.7 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 1.2
Splatting 1.8
0% 2 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.47%
Great: 0%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$20
265GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03E01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 94.4
Write 87.1
Mixed 89.6
68% 90.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.56
4K Mixed 0.39
94% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 7.6
19% 6.7 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 4.7
11% 3.73 GB/s
Latency 431
9% 431 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 39%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Aspire X3200 Builds (Compare 151 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire X3200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 14% - Very poor Total price: $22
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $42
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $356Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $653SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback