HP Laptop 14-fq0xxx

Performance Results

Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop 54%
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 14-fq0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 87B7
Memory4.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201118
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 30 '21 at 18:53
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U Graphics
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
45.9% Average
Memory 60.4
1-Core 93.5
2-Core 185
64% 113 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 175
25% 180 Pts
64-Core 182
12% 182 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 87B7) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.44
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
3.4% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 8.5
Parallax 5.3
3% 5.93 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 3.8
Splatting 11.2
4% 7.5 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.4%
Great: 8%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Ssstc CV8-8E128-HP 128GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V881
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 133 136 78 72 84 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 482
Write 392
Mixed 395
SusWrite 122
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 79
4K Mixed 44.3
153% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 112
121% 202 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
2667, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74% Very good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 23.1
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 28.5
SC Mixed 21.6
66% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 74%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Laptop 14-fq0xxx Builds (Compare 235 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop 46%
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 14-fq0xxx

The Best.
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Intel Core i7-11700K $346Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback