Asus ZenBook UX564EH_Q528EH

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics10.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus ZenBook UX564EH_Q528EH  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UX564EH
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200917
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 30 '21 at 01:29
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
49.4% Average
Memory 69.4
1-Core 94.8
2-Core 142
62% 102 Pts
4-Core 169
8-Core 191
24% 180 Pts
64-Core 218
15% 218 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Asus(1043 1402) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9268
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Lighting 24
Reflection 50
Parallax 29.3
19% 34.4 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 26%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Intel Optane+477G 512GB
381GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 18.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 561 594 673 620 86 144 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 54% Great: 96%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
60.3% Good
MC Read 23
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 19.5
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 9.2
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical ZenBook UX564EH_Q528EH Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Asus ZenBook UX564EH_Q528EH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-10700K $293Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $92SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback