Asrock X570 Creator

Performance Results


Gaming 97% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 107% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	316% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X570 Creator (all builds)
Memory	58.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210128
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 29 '21 at 21:49
Run Duration	361 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	21%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$249 60,132 User benchmarks, average bench 99% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	89.1% Excellent	Memory 83.4 1-Core 127 2-Core 254 85% 155 Pts	4-Core 508 8-Core 969 88% 739 Pts	64-Core 1,936 120% 1,936 Pts
Poor: 87% ↑ This bench: 89.1% Great: 108%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% Nvidia(10DE 12FE) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.92 Performing below potential (47^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	103% Outstanding	Lighting 127 Reflection 108 Parallax 125 103% 120 fps	MRender 175 Gravity 121 Splatting 98.9 104% 132 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Gigabyte Aorus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$80 15,656 User benchmarks, average bench 339% 558GB free (System drive) Firmware: EGFM11.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 3554 2703 974 961 968 969 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	316% Outstanding	Read 2,012 Write 3,605 Mixed 2,251 SusWrite 1688 542% 2,389 MB/s	4K Read 47.1 4K Write 177 4K Mixed 82 270% 102 MB/s	DQ Read 1,182 DQ Write 1006 DQ Mixed 1,094 820% 1,094 MB/s
Poor: 215% ↑ This bench: 316% Great: 491%
Gigabyte Aorus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$80 15,656 User benchmarks, average bench 339% 436GB free Firmware: EGFM11.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 3924 3858 3960 3990 3992 3986 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	456% Outstanding	Read 1,996 Write 1,874 Mixed 2,227 SusWrite 3,952 570% 2,512 MB/s	4K Read 49.6 4K Write 197 4K Mixed 81.3 283% 109 MB/s	DQ Read 1,173 DQ Write 938 DQ Mixed 1,076 800% 1,062 MB/s
Poor: 215% ↑ This bench: 456% Great: 491%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 12GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 497 Write 453 Mixed 405 101% 452 MB/s	4K Read 43.4 4K Write 92.5 4K Mixed 57.4 188% 64.4 MB/s	DQ Read 224 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 205 154% 206 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 180GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 63 64 64 63 62 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	40.9% Average	Read 79.8 Write 67.6 Mixed 54.1 SusWrite 62.5 49% 66 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 67%
WD Purple 3TB (2014)-$84 6,631 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 91GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 73 73 74 73 72 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	41.7% Average	Read 72.2 Write 59.9 Mixed 59.9 SusWrite 72.5 49% 66.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 85%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 226GB free Firmware: CC52 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 89 90 90 90 89 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	49% Average	Read 82.6 Write 63.4 Mixed 60.1 SusWrite 88.2 54% 73.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.5 95% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 96%
WD Red 8TB (2017)-$169 4,534 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 94GB free Firmware: 81.00A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 93 95 97 96 94 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	53.4% Above average	Read 88.8 Write 93.8 Mixed 65.8 SusWrite 95.3 63% 85.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 6.7 4K Mixed 1.8 374% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 110%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$180 4,231 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 82GB free Firmware: 83.H0A83 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 86 87 90 93 89 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	50.9% Above average	Read 88.2 Write 85.1 Mixed 52.6 SusWrite 88.9 58% 78.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1.4 237% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 97%
WD Red 8TB (2017)-$169 4,534 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 38GB free Firmware: 83.H0A83 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 88 87 85 92 82 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	48.7% Average	Read 81.7 Write 81.2 Mixed 59.5 SusWrite 85.9 57% 77.1 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 1.2 339% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 110%
Hitachi HUH721212ALE600 12TB 408 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 630GB free Firmware: LEGNT3D0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 122 124 124 118 128 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	70.4% Very good	Read 120 Write 125 Mixed 76.5 SusWrite 124 82% 111 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 5.6 4K Mixed 1.2 295% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 136%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMK32GX4M2Z3200C16 CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 CMK32GX4M2Z3200C16 CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 64GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	125% Outstanding	MC Read 61.1 MC Write 39.7 MC Mixed 41.2 135% 47.3 GB/s	SC Read 26.3 SC Write 22.7 SC Mixed 39.5 84% 29.5 GB/s	Latency 74.5 54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 128%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X570 Creator Builds (Compare 87 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 181%

UFO

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 228%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Creator

CPU
Ryzen 9 3950XAMD $506Bench 89%, 50,170 samples	29x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	19x
Ryzen 9 5950XAMD $416Bench 100%, 33,026 samples	15x

GPU
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $630Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	10x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	10x
RX 5700-XTAMD $250Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	8x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	10x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	9x
Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSabrent $100Bench 317%, 46,203 samples	7x

RAM
KHX3200C16D4/32GX 4x31.8GBKingstonBench 109%, 1,142 samples	4x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBCorsairBench 96%, 10,311 samples	4x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $1,234

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16