Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics69.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200701
Uptime7.2 Days
Run DateApr 29 '21 at 21:46
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$289
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Memory 77.9
1-Core 139
2-Core 276
91% 164 Pts
4-Core 499
8-Core 916
88% 708 Pts
64-Core 1,417
95% 1,417 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$230
Asus(1043 86BD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69.1% Good
Lighting 92.2
Reflection 89.4
Parallax 77.2
74% 86.3 fps
MRender 65.5
Gravity 80.1
Splatting 70.5
63% 72 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 73%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$60
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 1,559
Write 1,618
Mixed 1,235
328% 1,471 MB/s
4K Read 51.4
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 75.9
263% 98 MB/s
DQ Read 1,254
DQ Write 1,065
DQ Mixed 988
787% 1,102 MB/s
Poor: 139% Great: 238%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
656GB free
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 184 28 153 270 50 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 503
Write 421
Mixed 395
SusWrite 180
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 91.6
4K Mixed 25
121% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 37
62% 119 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 101%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB
57GB free, PID 5595
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 63 27 24 24 25 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 160
Write 61.4
Mixed 70
SusWrite 37.4
94% 82.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.7
160% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73% Very good
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 28.7
74% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 26.7
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 84.6
47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 73%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 23,309 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,136
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback