Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FJC_X512FJC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive134% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
CPU throttled at 78% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FJC_X512FJC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512FJC
Memory1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200325
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateApr 29 '21 at 20:11
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU5%
CPU Throttled 78%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-10510U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Memory 94.2
1-Core 140
2-Core 252
94% 162 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 586
65% 503 Pts
64-Core 588
39% 588 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 15CF) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9268
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
4.89% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 15.8
Parallax 6.7
4% 9.3 fps
MRender 7.6
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 11.3
6% 8.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.89%
Great: 6%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
NE-256 256GB
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0707A0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 213 351 361 188 301 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 1,347
Write 572
Mixed 463
SusWrite 294
147% 669 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 9.6
168% 73.5 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 65.9
127% 257 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 134%
Great: 221%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
866GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 113 115 112 114 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 160
Write 108
Mixed 74.5
SusWrite 113
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.7
182% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 81%
SAMSUNG HM160HI 160GB
34GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 37 37 37 37 36 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 28.4
Write 24
Mixed 22.4
SusWrite 36.3
38% 27.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
59% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Adata AM1P26KC8T1-BAAS 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
45% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 11.7
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 12.4
40% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 59.3
67% 59.3 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FJC_X512FJC Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FJC_X512FJC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $55
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $44
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-11700K $390Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $96SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback