MSI X299 RAIDER (MS-7A94)

Performance Results


Gaming 84% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 74% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	97.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	19.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7A94
Motherboard	MSI X299 RAIDER (MS-7A94) (all builds)
Memory	27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191017
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 29 '21 at 18:03
Run Duration	178 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	21%

Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7740X-$281 5,094 User benchmarks, average bench 87% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	84.4% Excellent	Memory 84.3 1-Core 141 2-Core 269 90% 164 Pts	4-Core 454 8-Core 752 74% 603 Pts	64-Core 763 47% 763 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510 319,148 User benchmarks, average bench 100% Gigabyte(1458 3FF1) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	97.4% Outstanding	Lighting 117 Reflection 109 Parallax 98.4 95% 108 fps	MRender 176 Gravity 112 Splatting 98.9 102% 129 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 97.4% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba A100 240GB 5,900 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFA10.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 91 17 1.7 25 1.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	19.2% Very poor	Read 428 Write 352 Mixed 250 SusWrite 31.8 59% 266 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.1 0% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 91%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 33GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 187 183 179 176 172 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 460 Write 470 Mixed 429 SusWrite 218 89% 394 MB/s	4K Read 40 4K Write 116 4K Mixed 62.6 202% 73 MB/s	DQ Read 387 DQ Write 337 DQ Mixed 363 272% 362 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 129%
WD WD3000JD-00KLB0 300GB 378 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 81GB free Firmware: 08.05J08 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 44 41 49 49 49 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	27.5% Poor	Read 48.7 Write 45.7 Mixed 37.2 SusWrite 46.6 33% 44.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 177% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 34%
Hitachi HTS547550A9E384 500GB-$60 23,997 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 117GB free Firmware: JE3OA50A SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 58 60 58 58 56 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	41.4% Average	Read 86.5 Write 50.7 Mixed 36.2 SusWrite 57.7 42% 57.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 97% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 50%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47 218,164 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 418GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 99 100 100 99 101 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	57.1% Above average	Read 99.5 Write 94.7 Mixed 55 SusWrite 99.3 64% 87.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GVKB 859B CT8G4DFS8266.M8FE 04CD F4-3200C16-8GVKB 859B CT8G4DFS8266.M8FE 32GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	68.4% Good	MC Read 24.1 MC Write 26.5 MC Mixed 20.8 68% 23.8 GB/s	SC Read 17.8 SC Write 28.3 SC Mixed 21.2 64% 22.4 GB/s	Latency 73 55% 73 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X299 RAIDER (MS-7A94) Builds (Compare 901 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 98%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 92%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI X299 RAIDER (MS-7A94)

CPU
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	293x
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	185x
Core i9-7900XIntel $420Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	113x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	140x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	81x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	56x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	34x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	28x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	24x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	168x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	135x
2x16GBUnknownBench 91%, 46,387 samples	103x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $791

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16