HP 110-020IL

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemHP 110-020IL  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AFB
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130506
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 29 '21 at 17:35
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G2030T
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Memory 79.9
1-Core 71.8
2-Core 134
58% 95.1 Pts
4-Core 134
8-Core 137
18% 136 Pts
64-Core 140
9% 140 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
HP(103C 2AFB) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3379
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.37% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.13 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 1
Splatting 2
2% 2.07 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.37%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
161GB free
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 222 217 218 216 225 MB/s
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.7% Above average
Read 237
Write 224
Mixed 219
SusWrite 219
51% 225 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 36.4
4K Mixed 20.3
80% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 46.5
75% 144 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
380GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 96 95 96 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 104
Write 107
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 92.7
65% 89.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 88%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
7GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 1.6 2.8 4.8 5.4 5.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 22.3
Write 5.7
SusWrite 3.9
10% 10.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 2.1
107% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 13%
MBIL SSM Moser Baer Disk 8GB
5GB free, PID 0081
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 3.6 3.3 3.3 4.1 4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
5.45% Terrible
Read 24.5
Write 21
Mixed 12.5
SusWrite 3.5
19% 15.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
21% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.45%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata Micron 4JTF25664AZ-1G6E1 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.6% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 14.8
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 12
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 110-020IL Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP 110-020IL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback