PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 46.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 64.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7C37 |
Motherboard | MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) (all builds) |
Memory | 8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20210303 |
Uptime | 2.7 Days |
Run Date | Apr 28 '21 at 23:36 |
Run Duration | 219 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 6% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
84.9%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 290-$399
CLim: 947 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.10.01.07
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
46.4%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial M500 240GB-$79
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 98 109 97 110 103 MB/s
|
64.5%
Good
|
|||
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$154
296GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1563 1279 1284 1197 1098 1042 MB/s
|
305%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$46
133GB free
Firmware: 12.01C01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 65 65 65 66 65 MB/s
|
35.9%
Below average
|
|||
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47
420GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 87 87 89 90 89 MB/s
|
41.7%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
65.6%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $210Bench 86%, 635,419 samples | 1,912x |
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $199Bench 98%, 128,080 samples | 1,515x |
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $144Bench 96%, 383,420 samples | 1,284x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples | 757x |
RTX 3080Nvidia $670Bench 187%, 424,051 samples | 618x |
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $442Bench 115%, 663,603 samples | 591x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 100% - Outstanding | Total price: $894 |