Samsung 700G7C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	11.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

6 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Samsung 700G7C (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP700G7C-S02TR
Memory	3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20140311
Uptime	11.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 28 '21 at 17:21
Run Duration	160 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420 65,927 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	68.9% Good	Memory 86.2 1-Core 84.2 2-Core 146 64% 106 Pts	4-Core 282 8-Core 394 42% 338 Pts	64-Core 408 25% 408 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 675M 994 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Sanyo(144D C0D0) 2GB CLim: 620 MHz, MLim: 750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	11.4% Very poor	Lighting 13.3 Reflection 18.3 Parallax 12.7 11% 14.8 fps	MRender 18.8 Gravity 14.8 Splatting 13 12% 15.5 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
HGST Travelstar 7K750 2.5" 500GB-$59 9,994 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 307GB free (System drive) Firmware: JF3OA0D0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 78 76 72 73 73 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	41.9% Average	Read 71.3 Write 71 Mixed 42 SusWrite 74.7 48% 64.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 112% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 59%
HGST Travelstar 7K750 2.5" 500GB-$59 9,994 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 18GB free Firmware: JF3OA0D0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 46 47 47 47 48 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	26.3% Poor	Read 44.8 Write 47.3 Mixed 31.3 SusWrite 46.7 31% 42.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 26.3% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 2x4GB 1,385 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	55.3% Above average	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 19 MC Mixed 17.6 55% 19.3 GB/s	SC Read 15.9 SC Write 15.7 SC Mixed 16.4 46% 16 GB/s	Latency 71.1 56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 700G7C Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 700G7C

CPU
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	37x
Core i7-3610QMIntel $300Bench 62%, 38,575 samples	37x
Core i7-3720QMIntel $100Bench 65%, 9,911 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 675MNvidiaBench 12%, 994 samples	69x
Radeon HD 7800MAMDBench 9%, 500 samples	6x

SSD
PM830 128GBSamsungBench 61%, 13,767 samples	5x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	5x
840 Pro 256GBSamsung $190Bench 95%, 73,119 samples	3x

RAM
AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 4x4GBAdataBench 54%, 166 samples	19x
M471B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 52%, 981 samples	14x
M471B5273EB0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 54%, 118 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $420

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16