Asus TUF B360M-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics68% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive48.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF B360M-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190517
Uptime2 Days
Run DateApr 28 '21 at 12:08
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$145
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
70% Good
Memory 75.3
1-Core 99.2
2-Core 221
74% 132 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 424
53% 394 Pts
64-Core 375
25% 375 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 70%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$230
Nvidia(10DE 2184) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68% Good
Lighting 90.1
Reflection 89.3
Parallax 78.5
73% 86 fps
MRender 65.9
Gravity 79.5
Splatting 71.9
62% 72.4 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 68%
Great: 73%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$40
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF220400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 119 126 131 112 57 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 434
Write 351
Mixed 295
SusWrite 133
68% 303 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 31.6
4K Mixed 14.9
64% 21.8 MB/s
DQ Read 80.7
DQ Write 67.9
DQ Mixed 31.9
36% 60.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
32GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 99 93 98 96 102 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 70.5
Write 67.5
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 97
53% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 71%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
26GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 95 83 84 81 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 120
Write 118
Mixed 74.4
SusWrite 89.2
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 71%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23
44GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 73 74 74 75 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 125
Write 123
Mixed 64
SusWrite 73.6
71% 96.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
132% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 57%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Adata DDR4 3000 Kingston KHX2666C16/8G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
62.2% Good
MC Read 23.6
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 20.4
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 16
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 89.7
45% 89.7 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF B360M-E GAMING Builds (Compare 1,334 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360M-E GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $486
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback