Performance Results


Gaming 40% Speed boat	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 35% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	46.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 17-cd0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 85FF
Memory	2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190704
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 27 '21 at 17:43
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9300H 116,682 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	82.6% Excellent	Memory 93.2 1-Core 122 2-Core 219 84% 145 Pts	4-Core 388 8-Core 641 63% 515 Pts	64-Core 646 40% 646 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 82.6% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile) 92,838 User benchmarks, average bench 41% HP(103C 85FF) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6611 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	46.6% Average	Lighting 61.7 Reflection 61.9 Parallax 52.9 50% 58.8 fps	MRender 41.5 Gravity 52.8 Splatting 49.5 40% 47.9 fps
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv512g TOSHIBA 512GB 10,256 User benchmarks, average bench 122% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: ADHA0102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 126 143 165 214 207 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 680 Write 222 Mixed 237 SusWrite 166 71% 326 MB/s	4K Read 34.9 4K Write 87.4 4K Mixed 35.7 145% 52.7 MB/s	DQ Read 785 DQ Write 125 DQ Mixed 382 298% 431 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 166%
Seagate Expansion SSD 500GB 254 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 79GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 309 171 97 97 97 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	52.5% Above average	Read 360 Write 295 Mixed 270 SusWrite 177 62% 275 MB/s	4K Read 18.8 4K Write 36.9 4K Mixed 20.7 75% 25.5 MB/s	DQ Read 89.2 DQ Write 104 DQ Mixed 94.1 72% 95.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 58%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB 11,959 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 6.5TB free Firmware: 0915 SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 184 177 178 178 183 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	95.5% Outstanding	Read 150 Write 161 Mixed 146 SusWrite 181 118% 160 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 0.9 322% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 95.5% Great: 94%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GB 48,644 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	38.2% Below average	MC Read 13.6 MC Write 12.1 MC Mixed 11.7 36% 12.5 GB/s	SC Read 7.8 SC Write 12.2 SC Mixed 13.3 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 61.7 65% 61.7 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	521x
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	251x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 57%, 12,899 samples	198x

SSD
hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG-8310A 512GBSKBench 131%, 6,904 samples	145x
MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 174%, 20,171 samples	95x
TOSHIBA 512GBKbg30zmv512gBench 122%, 10,256 samples	62x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	218x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	68x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	59x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16