Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics56.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive289% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200729
Uptime13.5 Days
Run DateApr 27 '21 at 17:37
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User CYP-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$270
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Memory 79.7
1-Core 138
2-Core 277
92% 165 Pts
4-Core 549
8-Core 1,068
100% 809 Pts
64-Core 1,482
100% 1,482 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$290
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.4% Above average
Lighting 69.3
Reflection 74.3
Parallax 67.7
56% 70.4 fps
MRender 66.4
Gravity 71.1
Splatting 67.5
57% 68.3 fps
Poor: 52%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 61%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$70
377GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 909 632 583 613 647 651 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
289% Outstanding
Read 2,546
Write 2,346
Mixed 1,687
SusWrite 672
405% 1,813 MB/s
4K Read 65.2
4K Write 165
4K Mixed 89.5
301% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1,265
DQ Write 1081
DQ Mixed 1,162
874% 1,169 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 289%
Great: 318%
SanDisk Ultra 3D 1TB-$105
384GB free
Firmware: X61170RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 493 494 493 493 493 490 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 463
Write 489
Mixed 397
SusWrite 493
104% 460 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 50.8
186% 68.3 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 248
196% 273 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 119%
Great: 120%
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB
319GB free
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1146 981 626 540 538 536 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
226% Outstanding
Read 1491
Write 1,152
Mixed 1,038
SusWrite 728
246% 1,102 MB/s
4K Read 63.7
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 86.2
291% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 766
DQ Write 654
DQ Mixed 348
360% 589 MB/s
Poor: 122%
This bench: 226%
Great: 277%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31
730GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 137 138 139 137 134 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Read 167
Write 155
Mixed 106
SusWrite 136
104% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
248% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 108%
WD WD10JPCX-24UE4T0 1TB
784GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 108 108 110 110 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 108
Write 105
Mixed 55.6
SusWrite 108
69% 94.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
MC Read 36.6
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 36.4
92% 32.3 GB/s
SC Read 28
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 37.7
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 81.1
49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 17,439 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $258

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,167
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback