Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium J3710 2,453 User benchmarks, average bench 27% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	30.4% Below average	Memory 46.3 1-Core 25.6 2-Core 52.2 27% 41.4 Pts	4-Core 82.9 8-Core 99.2 12% 91.1 Pts	64-Core 97.9 6% 97.9 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 34%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 81BB) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.83% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 0.5 Parallax 3.6 2% 2.1 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 2.7 Splatting 2.3 2% 2.33 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.83% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 120GB 22,748 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 66GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFMBB.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 138 70 46 54 30 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	49.5% Average	Read 271 Write 233 Mixed 302 SusWrite 87.2 50% 223 MB/s	4K Read 17.5 4K Write 37.7 4K Mixed 24.8 78% 26.7 MB/s	DQ Read 215 DQ Write 179 DQ Mixed 164 132% 186 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 94%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G9P1 1x4GB 3,980 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	18% Very poor	MC Read 7.3 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 5.4 19% 6.53 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 3.3 10% 3.4 GB/s	Latency 175 23% 175 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 28%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium J3710IntelBench 27%, 2,453 samples	20x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	20x

SSD
SHGS31-1000GS-2 1TBBench 98%, 11,576 samples	2x
CS900 240GBPNY $20Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	1x
MZ7TY256HDHP-000L7 256GBSamsungBench 85%, 4,113 samples	1x

RAM
HP16D3LS1KBGH/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 16%, 5,684 samples	5x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 64,960 samples	4x
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 52%, 22,647 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16