Asus P8P67

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	10.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	72.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

Motherboard	Asus P8P67 (all builds)
Memory	9.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121101
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 26 '21 at 15:44
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	30%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$194 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	77.3% Very good	Memory 93.1 1-Core 110 2-Core 208 80% 137 Pts	4-Core 334 8-Core 492 52% 413 Pts	64-Core 498 31% 498 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 77.3% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250 54,392 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Asus(1043 838C) 1GB CLim: 1008 MHz, MLim: 1335 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	10.1% Very poor	Lighting 11.5 Reflection 17.8 Parallax 10.7 9% 13.3 fps	MRender 17.6 Gravity 12.9 Splatting 12.2 11% 14.2 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 10.1% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 240 235 237 237 235 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	Read 334 Write 235 Mixed 256 SusWrite 236 60% 266 MB/s	4K Read 31 4K Write 48.4 4K Mixed 36.8 120% 38.7 MB/s	DQ Read 172 DQ Write 135 DQ Mixed 145 111% 151 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 124%
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40 25,285 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 373GB free Firmware: 1AA01112 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 80 81 80 80 82 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	44.7% Average	Read 74.5 Write 85.1 Mixed 53 SusWrite 80.6 54% 73.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.1 201% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 59%
Intenso Rainbow Line 4GB 297 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 4GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 4.2 3.9 3.9 3.6 4 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	3.93% Terrible	Read 15.2 Write 5 Mixed 1.7 SusWrite 3.8 7% 6.43 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.93% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8GX 9905471-001.A01LF 9905471-001.A01LF 12GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	34.4% Below average	MC Read 12 MC Write 10.5 MC Mixed 10.3 31% 10.9 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 11.6 SC Mixed 10.7 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 61.9 65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,491 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	444x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	357x
Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	199x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	117x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	103x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	95x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	49x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	46x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	33x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	38x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	34x
XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 4,223 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $666

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16