| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 1.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 31.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus H61M-F (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20131212 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 26 '21 at 14:58 |
| Run Duration | 147 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 100% |
PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
44.3%
Average
|
49% 81.9 Pts
|
19% 143 Pts
|
10% 154 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Asus(1043 844D) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
|
1.5%
Terrible
|
2% 1.6 fps
|
2% 1.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 120GB-$32
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 122 118 121 125 125 MB/s
|
31.4%
Below average
|
30% 135 MB/s
|
49% 16.3 MB/s
|
28% 39.9 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
465GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 123 124 123 123 125 MB/s
|
69.1%
Good
|
76% 104 MB/s
|
150% 1.03 MB/s
| |
|
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9
54GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.3 7.5 10 18 17 14 MB/s
|
10.5%
Very poor
|
19% 15.7 MB/s
|
116% 1.97 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
26.3%
Poor
|
25% 8.73 GB/s
|
24% 8.37 GB/s
|
35% 113 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61M-F Builds (Compare 167 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H61M-F
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 20x |
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 18x |
| Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples | 15x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 31x |
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 13x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 10x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $325 |