Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	25.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX504GD
Memory	19.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190430
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 26 '21 at 14:14
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	ZAF-User
Background CPU	12%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	82% Excellent	Memory 81.4 1-Core 114 2-Core 237 80% 144 Pts	4-Core 445 8-Core 676 70% 561 Pts	64-Core 740 46% 740 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile) 160,694 User benchmarks, average bench 23% Asus(1043 10C1) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2546 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	25.1% Poor	Lighting 31.6 Reflection 31.8 Parallax 32.1 26% 31.8 fps	MRender 35.1 Gravity 34.5 Splatting 21 24% 30.2 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 25.1% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ 128GB 18,233 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: E8FK11.C SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 30 27 24 28 34 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	51.9% Above average	Read 468 Write 141 Mixed 189 SusWrite 44.2 46% 211 MB/s	4K Read 17.2 4K Write 62.6 4K Mixed 16.3 80% 32 MB/s	DQ Read 174 DQ Write 123 DQ Mixed 158 115% 151 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 115%
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB 40,802 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 629GB free Firmware: 03.01A03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 105 106 106 105 105 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	60.8% Good	Read 107 Write 96.8 Mixed 67.4 SusWrite 104 69% 93.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 0.3 154% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 859B CT16G4SFD824A.M16FE 24GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2667, 2400 MHz 8192, 16384 MB Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	76.6% Very good	MC Read 29.3 MC Write 30.2 MC Mixed 22.2 78% 27.2 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 31.6 SC Mixed 23.5 68% 23.9 GB/s	Latency 78 51% 78 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD Builds (Compare 2,610 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

CPU
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	1,691x
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	919x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,555x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	1,054x
RX 5700-XTAMD $250Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	1x

SSD
RBUSNS8154P3128GJ 128GBKingstonBench 81%, 18,233 samples	324x
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GBKingstonBench 96%, 18,615 samples	120x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	109x

RAM
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	874x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	220x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	80x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16