Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4100 6,492 User benchmarks, average bench 33% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	37.1% Below average	Memory 46.7 1-Core 48.7 2-Core 95.3 37% 63.6 Pts	4-Core 164 8-Core 142 21% 153 Pts	64-Core 171 11% 171 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Clevo(1558 5157) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.7988 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.89% Terrible	Lighting 1.9 Reflection 1.8 Parallax 2.4 2% 2.03 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 3.7 2% 3.03 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.89% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59 69,933 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE220400 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 351 Write 289 Mixed 246 66% 295 MB/s	4K Read 11.2 4K Write 17.1 4K Mixed 9.5 38% 12.6 MB/s	DQ Read 111 DQ Write 79.5 DQ Mixed 16.6 34% 68.9 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4SFS8266.M8FD 1x8GB 1,339 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	24.1% Poor	MC Read 8.6 MC Write 9.1 MC Mixed 9.7 26% 9.13 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 3.8 11% 3.8 GB/s	Latency 174 23% 174 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 24.1% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16