PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 4.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 94.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP ENVY m6 Notebook PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 18A6 |
Memory | 13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160907 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Apr 26 '21 at 13:33 |
Run Duration | 135 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD A10-5750M APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
|
44.7%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Radeon HD 8650G
HP(103C 18A6) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1055.0
|
4.35%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
428GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 369 372 377 383 383 MB/s
|
94.1%
Outstanding
|
|||
SanDisk Cruzer 4GB
4GB free, PID 5530
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 7.3 7.5 7.5 7.7 7 MB/s
|
5.71%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial CT102464BF160B.M16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
31.4%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples | 81x |
Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples | 66x |
Core i7-3632QMIntelBench 61%, 24,912 samples | 55x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples | 210x |
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples | 31x |
Radeon HD 7660GAMDBench 4%, 4,227 samples | 29x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $90 |