Performance Results


Gaming 62% Destroyer	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 77% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	89.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	182% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI (all builds)
Memory	28.6 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191206
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Apr 26 '21 at 04:41
Run Duration	178 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	76%

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT-$438 16,922 User benchmarks, average bench 89% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	64.7% Good	Memory 64.4 1-Core 110 2-Core 208 70% 128 Pts	4-Core 348 8-Core 806 66% 577 Pts	64-Core 1,947 120% 1,947 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510 319,148 User benchmarks, average bench 100% Gigabyte(1458 3FF1) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 462.31 Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	89.6% Excellent	Lighting 107 Reflection 100 Parallax 130 87% 112 fps	MRender 158 Gravity 102 Splatting 96.7 94% 119 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 89.6% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68 97,624 User benchmarks, average bench 204% 257GB free (System drive) Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 536 401 301 289 285 308 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	182% Outstanding	Read 1,462 Write 1,470 Mixed 1,176 SusWrite 353 250% 1,115 MB/s	4K Read 43.8 4K Write 114 4K Mixed 61.6 205% 73 MB/s	DQ Read 971 DQ Write 725 DQ Mixed 840 630% 845 MB/s
Poor: 152% ↑ This bench: 182% Great: 237%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 492GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 359 366 330 389 382 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	90.2% Outstanding	Read 459 Write 370 Mixed 365 SusWrite 358 87% 388 MB/s	4K Read 31.1 4K Write 67.8 4K Mixed 39.4 134% 46.1 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 175 DQ Mixed 152 124% 177 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 90.2% Great: 133%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB 13,039 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 671GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 251 220 281 179 224 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	52% Above average	Read 308 Write 211 Mixed 270 SusWrite 230 57% 255 MB/s	4K Read 17 4K Write 25.9 4K Mixed 12.8 56% 18.6 MB/s	DQ Read 208 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 201 150% 200 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW16GX4M1D3000C16 3x16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 3 of 4 slots used 48GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	66.7% Good	MC Read 24.7 MC Write 24.1 MC Mixed 24.4 70% 24.4 GB/s	SC Read 16.7 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 24.3 55% 19.2 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 74%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 182%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 181%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	443x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	294x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	226x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	235x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	193x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	137x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $1,205

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16