Asus PRIME X370-A

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	223% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-A (all builds)
Memory	59 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170413
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jul 09 '17 at 08:38
Run Duration	297 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	69.2% Good	Memory 67.3 1-Core 108 2-Core 215 71% 130 Pts	4-Core 382 8-Core 714 65% 548 Pts	64-Core 1,257 78% 1,257 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 224 User benchmarks, average bench 19% AMD(1002 0B0D) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1201 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 16.6 Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	18.3% Very poor	Lighting 20.6 Reflection 27.8 Parallax 27.6 17% 25.4 fps	MRender 26.8 Gravity 20.4 Splatting 29.3 21% 25.5 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 20%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 240GB-$80 4,893 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 205GB free Firmware: 2.15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 94 94 51175952 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 59 59 -115242562450236 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 686 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 31 (B1) Unknown 0 0 5 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 51175952 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 51175952 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 51175952 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 21822 (EA) Unknown 0 0 14809 (F1) Unknown 0 0 14809 (F2) Unknown 0 0 43922	79% Very good	Read 492 Write 238 Mixed 297 75% 342 MB/s	4K Read 30.1 4K Write 81.1 4K Mixed 20.4 115% 43.8 MB/s	DQ Read 270 DQ Write 234 DQ Mixed 80.3 107% 195 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 91%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 166GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	223% Outstanding	Read 2,188 Write 1,247 Mixed 1,227 342% 1,554 MB/s	4K Read 51.1 4K Write 92.8 4K Mixed 35.8 172% 59.9 MB/s	DQ Read 221 DQ Write 145 DQ Mixed 26.3 62% 131 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 223% Great: 236%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 253 0 (03) Spinup time 183 182 3850 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 28 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 17 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 14 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 10 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 17 (C2) HDA temperature 118 115 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	104% Outstanding	Read 174 Write 187 Mixed 182 137% 181 MB/s	4K Read 0.98 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.47 143% 1.38 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 112%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40 97,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 862GB free Firmware: JP4OA3EA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 135 135 96 (03) Spinup time 135 135 25785270595 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1884 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 138 138 31 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 48062 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 455 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 2570 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 2570 (C2) HDA temperature 187 187 201863856160 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	76.9% Very good	Read 134 Write 134 Mixed 125 99% 131 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 1.43 4K Mixed 0.39 100% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 74%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 347GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 175 170 4225 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8490 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 46 46 39843 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1498 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 227 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 8262 (C2) HDA temperature 114 96 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	56.8% Above average	Read 106 Write 92.1 Mixed 90.4 72% 96.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.85 4K Write 1.67 4K Mixed 0.44 115% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 76%
SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB 103 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 580GB free, PID 0c31 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	15.4% Very poor	Read 35.2 Write 37.7 Mixed 35.7 47% 36.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 0.64 4K Mixed 0.25 31% 0.42 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 19%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9 17,023 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 18GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	22.6% Poor	Read 58.2 Write 64.6 Mixed 60.7 80% 61.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.12 4K Write 0.003 4K Mixed 0.1 4% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 22.6% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLE16G4D32AEEA.K16FB F4-3200C16-16GVK BLE16G4D32AEEA.K16FB F4-3200C16-16GVK 64GB 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	64.4% Good	MC Read 24.8 MC Write 21.5 MC Mixed 21.9 65% 22.7 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 25.2 SC Mixed 21.9 62% 21.8 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-A Builds (Compare 440 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-A

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	57x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $82Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	48x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	44x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	34x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	34x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	29x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	13x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	10x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	21x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $38Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	13x
HyperX 2666 C16 2x16GBKingstonBench 84%, 17,710 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $677

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16