Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive110% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210320
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 25 '21 at 11:30
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$370
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Memory 78.9
1-Core 164
2-Core 328
104% 191 Pts
4-Core 634
8-Core 1,160
112% 897 Pts
64-Core 1,680
113% 1,680 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$359
Zotac(19DA 2445) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2277 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 140
Parallax 130
105% 133 fps
MRender 108
Gravity 134
Splatting 118
105% 120 fps
Poor: 88%
This bench: 105%
Great: 104%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 359 359 310 354 361 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 517
Write 394
Mixed 332
SusWrite 350
89% 398 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 48.5
180% 67.7 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 230
188% 268 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 110%
Great: 126%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$70
102GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 468 379 378 381 379 379 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 519
Write 496
Mixed 451
SusWrite 394
105% 465 MB/s
4K Read 48.3
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 66.6
223% 78.8 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 373
280% 375 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 131%
Great: 130%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2017)-$81
581GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 122 127 116 121 132 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 89.4
Write 118
Mixed 73.6
SusWrite 122
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
59% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$35
712GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 159 163 158 158 169 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 140
Write 140
Mixed 76.9
SusWrite 161
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 113%
WD My Passport 25E1 4TB
450GB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 64 64 64 64 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
44% Average
Read 78.7
Write 65.2
Mixed 62
SusWrite 65.6
91% 67.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 0.7
227% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 44%
Great: 66%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB
57GB free, PID 5595
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 44 23 26 24 22 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 169
Write 59.4
Mixed 66.6
SusWrite 34.2
92% 82.4 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.1
88% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Adata DDR4 2800 2OZ 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.4% Very good
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 28
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 27
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 29.6
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 82.6
48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 10,930 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 146%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 138%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $991
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $379Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback