Asus P7H55-M PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	49.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P7H55-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110104
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 24 '21 at 14:05
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-750-$72 43,796 User benchmarks, average bench 62% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	79.2% Very good	Memory 92.1 1-Core 98.4 2-Core 197 75% 129 Pts	4-Core 388 8-Core 366 51% 377 Pts	64-Core 387 24% 387 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399 68,699 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Sapphire(174B E285) CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.11.2 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	49.6% Average	Lighting 64.8 Reflection 70.5 Parallax 84.4 53% 73.2 fps	MRender 61.8 Gravity 57.7 Splatting 43.3 43% 54.3 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate STT_FTM28G225H 128GB 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2142 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 92 86 91 98 93 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB 17,984 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 18GB free Firmware: 02.01C03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 55 56 56 57 56 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	25.9% Poor	Read 33.9 Write 31.9 Mixed 25.2 SusWrite 55.7 27% 36.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 35%
Samsung HD642JJ 640GB-$70 13,060 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 10GB free Firmware: 1AA01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 95 88 91 99 93 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	54.7% Above average	Read 97.6 Write 57.1 Mixed 55.7 SusWrite 92.8 56% 75.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.1 194% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 63%
Lexar JumpDrive S25 USB 3.0 64GB-$13 1,615 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 60GB free, PID a838 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 5.4 20 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	11.1% Very poor	Read 31.6 Write 26.1 Mixed 10.7 SusWrite 21.7 29% 22.5 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.7 46% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 800, 800, 800, 800 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	39.1% Below average	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 12.4 MC Mixed 11.9 36% 12.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.4 SC Write 12.8 SC Mixed 12.4 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 63.8 63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7H55-M PRO Builds (Compare 417 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7H55-M PRO

CPU
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	76x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	69x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	58x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	28x
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	24x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	18x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	30x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	15x
SSD Pro 1500 Series 180GBIntel $209Bench 69%, 7,834 samples	7x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	163x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	113x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	41x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $326

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16