Medion MD34102/C651

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMedion MD34102/C651  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION H110H4-EM
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170713
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateApr 24 '21 at 11:33
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$95
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Memory 87.5
1-Core 112
2-Core 193
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 429
55% 415 Pts
64-Core 415
26% 415 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8627) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.4% Poor
Lighting 35.6
Reflection 40
Parallax 37.8
29% 37.8 fps
MRender 37.4
Gravity 37.9
Splatting 27
27% 34.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30000P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 125 128 120 90 66 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 431
Write 129
Mixed 153
SusWrite 108
45% 205 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 77.2
4K Mixed 20.7
114% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 341
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 122
120% 198 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 70%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: SVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 109 115 116 116 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 318
Write 303
Mixed 298
SusWrite 113
58% 258 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 38.8
4K Mixed 29.1
94% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 132
98% 129 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 87%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
865GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 183 186 184 183 187 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 159
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 182
102% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
126% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 105%
Great: 107%
Samsung HM321HI 320GB-$90
298GB free
Firmware: 2AJ1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 89 91 91 91 91 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
50% Average
Read 85.8
Write 50.8
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 88.4
51% 69.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 50%
Great: 50%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
931GB free
Firmware: MS2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 107 112 113 113 114 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 181
Write 160
Mixed 38.7
SusWrite 110
89% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
137% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX6O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 108 113 115 115 116 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 180
Write 153
Mixed 35.5
SusWrite 111
87% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
138% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
44.8% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 12.3
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 13.4
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MD34102/C651 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Medion MD34102/C651

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $187
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback